|
Author
|
Topic: Cover Art
|
LOst unregistered
|
posted January 24, 2006 08:30 PM
Jan - The navy blue color was sometimes used in ads because the Sega logo was colored that way.kurisu - I never realized the back hand and foot were bigger. What I hate the most is the round head making the spike row look so remote. I know the actual source of this design came from the title screen of Sonic 1, but the artist missed the real spike design. The eyes and pose are a direct Sonic 1 title screen copy. As for kids liking this design, I don't think that was the case. All we Sega fanboys had an ad of this Sonic on the wall because there were no other Sega ad available! How can you ba a Sega fan without a Sonic picture on the wall? I have hated that Sonic since day one  [edited January 24, 2006 by LOst] IP: 82.212.73.245 |
AngstOverlord unregistered
|
posted January 26, 2006 06:59 PM
Because I'm so totally EVIL, I have a Shadow Review with happy pictures I got myself. I so love the picture of Shadow in the park with the bannanamouth. Bar proportions are off since the page fits inside the World of Angst's page. WHOO. BANNANAMOUTH. Interestingly, there were a few examples of Sonic actually looking on-model. I can name one, which was the Sega Kids poster (which was b/w for COLORING FUN) which came with Wacky Worlds. I so want one again. Sonic was painting and looking not like a freak, while Tails was conducting music. It had color ads on the back and a mailing thing to join the Sega Kids Club and get a Sonic shirt. I was never allowed to. AAANGST. Yeah, I can be really specific when I want to be =P. Personally I hated the original US Sonic-mock. It just didn't look much like he was in-game. Still, that happened so MUCH. Awesome Possum was the same way. He gots a widdle facial mask that exists in the level title cards and in the actual game. Boxart and main title screen? PAH. I wanner try to do a mockup of the X-treme box later. IP: 12.226.76.67 |
Exabyte256 unregistered
|
posted January 27, 2006 09:27 AM
That shadow picture and all the movie clips I've seen come out lately have all the characters' mouths half-way up their face. It makes them look so stupid and distorted that every time I see them it's a continuous reminder of how awful sonic has turned out. This is a flat-fish. It has evolved in such a way that it's features have moved over to one side of it's face. But despite all this, one important thing to note is it's mouth is still in the center of it's head. SonicTeam could learn from the flat-fish.
IP: 88.105.157.203 |
Keith Hemari unregistered
|
posted January 27, 2006 09:42 AM
Can we please not turn this into "I hate ____" fest? Please? Pretty please?I'm getting pretty sick of hearing it on just about every forum I go to and I really would rather not have it interfere with this great event. Ok? Think we can keep a cap on it? Good. IP: 65.185.143.72 |
kurisu Administrator
|
posted January 27, 2006 09:57 AM
Okay, okay. Keith has a good point. But... I can't stop laughing. If one takes a step back, it really is hilarious. I was uncomfortable with of egg's comments, I reacted... and now he doesn't post anymore (if you're reading egg, I did extend a hand for a handshake... and you're welcome to come back... *crickets*). Anywho, unless it's directed at us personally, let's try and laugh stuff off if we can.Honestly, any jabs at Sonic Team or anyone doing art are just opinions. Sure, they are not hear to defend themselves, but as long as the "hate" posts are creative like this and not too tactless, especially with humor... I laugh, at least. So, if we can all take everything with a grain of salt, that's cool. I don't have any more cover art to share... and I needed a laugh this morning because I was sick last night  [edited January 27, 2006 by kurisu] IP: 24.126.160.81 |
kurisu Administrator
|
posted January 27, 2006 10:46 AM
I would like to add, however, that despite the BANANAMOUTH and lessons to be learned from the Flatfish, I do like the new Sonic and Shadow & co. The way I would draw Sonic would be the old, "classic" way, but who knows... maybe I'll start drawing this new way... with the mouth in the spot where the mouth actually goes!  IP: 66.77.144.8 |
AngstOverlord unregistered
|
posted January 27, 2006 12:50 PM
I don't think the Shadow CG model was awful, anyway. That baby's got some detail. The EYES. It's just that particular frame... well, it looks goofy. Angst loves really weird facial issues. Like that Batman animted episode when Alfred's eyes just started bugging out independantly.I just disliked the old US style, but they got better... Sonic 3's art had some nice effort for the background and all. Same with the GG games. The Japanese boxes never really even DID backgrounds... IP: 12.226.76.67 |
Guess_Who unregistered
|
posted January 27, 2006 04:14 PM
I'm new here. I'm Guess Who, I'm in to graphic design and Sonic, which makes me a pretty good fit here. Some of you may know me. I've been lurking here ever since HXC first posted some of this stuff at another website and I finally decided to join up.  I noticed some of you were planning to make mock-up box arts based on Mr. Senn's drawing, and I thought this might be of some use to you guys - it's a recreation of the logo used on the "official" box arts that's almost exactly proportionate to those logos and is reasonably high resolution. It's not perfect, but it's the best I could do with such a low-resolution image as a base. My image is a 24-bit alpha-transparent PNG, so image quality is not an issue.  I love that cover design, by the way, kurisu. It's totally awesome. Base pic: [edited January 27, 2006 by Guess_Who] IP: 69.151.179.63 |
Psychobob unregistered
|
posted January 28, 2006 02:09 AM
quote: Originally posted by kurisu: I would like to add, however, that despite the BANANAMOUTH and lessons to be learned from the Flatfish, I do like the new Sonic and Shadow & co. The way I would draw Sonic would be the old, "classic" way, but who knows... maybe I'll start drawing this new way... with the mouth in the spot where the mouth actually goes! 
I know you keep saying you like to draw Sonic the ‘Old’ way, to me it’s not SEGA’s ‘old’ way. I find your style is very similar to that of the Archie comic sometime during 1993/1994. Were you inspired by these comics/ base your Sonic art cover on their design? Now where have I seen that Sonic style and pose before? IP: 62.253.128.12 |
AngstOverlord unregistered
|
posted January 28, 2006 09:07 AM
quote: I noticed some of you were planning to make mock-up box arts based on Mr. Senn's drawing, and I thought this might be of some use to you guys
Spifftastic! I can actually see if I have any Saturn games with the white/grey motif with no leaking covers. Those boxes are so tediously big, but I love them... sure, they break easily, but no worse than the old PS boxes. Mostly glue and paper? What were they thinking?!? IP: 12.226.76.67 |
Android18a unregistered
|
posted January 29, 2006 08:40 AM
^ That's one of the best pieces of Sonic art I've seen in years. Oh, and hi. I'm new. IP: 82.3.32.73 |
darkshadow unregistered
|
posted January 29, 2006 11:04 AM
Nah This is
IP: 172.133.53.56 |
Psychobob unregistered
|
posted January 29, 2006 12:53 PM
You post one piece of art and suddenly everybody’s doing it.At leased my image of Sonic served a point, to which Chris still has yet to reply. Chris, if you reading this, then please can you reply to my last post, and also the post in the storyboard topic. Thanks mate.
IP: 62.253.128.12 |
thebeast unregistered
|
posted January 29, 2006 01:23 PM
my view on this matter? Darkshadow you might be right, that picture is bloody gorgeous but some of Sonicteam's rendered stuff has been pretty sweet [for instance most of the Shadow official art and the Sonic Mobile Phone image]. I was quite dissapointed with the Sonic Heroes stuff so it's been nice [personally I think the Sonic Gems box art is the best art of Metal Sonic I've seen...well since the cover of Sonic CD [the screensaver] I'm done.MeX PS. I havent actually posted on this topic, So I'll just say that Kirusu's version is far superior in my opinion [it's IMO innit?], You can really see it in Darkshadow's photoshopped version. I loved the Sonic CD animation, the OVA, [see fans of Sonic SatAM can like more than one Sonic cartoon] and it really is evocative of it [ooh evocative BIG WORD!!] IP: 172.209.110.243 |
darkshadow unregistered
|
posted January 29, 2006 06:08 PM
How is hot linking from sonic hq saying''Ooooi, hotlinker , noooooo!'' helpfull Here is the image you were trying to show. IP: 172.137.43.225 |
Keith Hemari unregistered
|
posted January 29, 2006 07:13 PM
quote: Originally posted by darkshadow: How is hot linking from sonic hq saying''Ooooi, hotlinker , noooooo!'' helpfull Here is the image you were trying to show.
While Spaz is undoubtedly kick-ass, that is mostly due to the fact that he, like Chris, got Sonic pretty much spot-on. As the imagery from Sonic Jam shows us: and incase you want to know how to do that: these images, and others that I have come from the image galleries of Sonic Jam. I got them from www.soniconthe.net as a bit torrent download. It includes a lot of art, but also reference images on Sonic, Tails, Knuckles, and Eggman! IP: 65.185.143.72 |
Psychobob unregistered
|
posted January 30, 2006 02:23 AM
quote: Originally posted by darkshadow: How is hot linking from sonic hq saying''Ooooi, hotlinker , noooooo!'' helpfull Here is the image you were trying to show.
First off I was hotlinking to TSS (The Sonic Stadium NOT Sonic HQ, and since I work there I'm sure they won't mind. Secondly you can see that image clear as day, there's not a 'hot link' logo. IP: 62.253.128.12 |
darkshadow unregistered
|
posted January 30, 2006 04:05 AM
Sorry about that. It still shows me the hotlink . Can anybody ese see it. Heres the proof
IP: 172.128.32.5 |
hxc Member
|
posted January 30, 2006 11:10 AM
Indeed mate, it shows hotlinker to all us.IP: 88.111.225.184 |
Exabyte256 unregistered
|
posted January 30, 2006 12:30 PM
Psychobob - They have a hotlink thingy set up to work like this: If the computer trying to load the image hasn't loaded a webpage from our site beforehand, then show the "nooo" image instead.IP: 88.105.157.203 |
darkshadow unregistered
|
posted January 30, 2006 08:08 PM
Which torrent Keith?IP: 172.173.121.80 |
Keith Hemari unregistered
|
posted January 30, 2006 09:24 PM
http://www.soniconthe.net/details.php?id=1032 That one. Sorry, should have posted it with the images^^ It's really worth the download, I can tell you. Only sonic has the how-to style thing, but the other have plenty of reference. IP: 65.185.143.72 |
Dioxaz unregistered
|
posted January 31, 2006 05:32 AM
I guess these are all the DG2 pictures included on the Sonic Jam disc. However, there is a way to view these DG2 files on a PC. A japanese viewer maned Susie can do that.The French Sonic-online website also offer these in PNG but, unfortunately, they're all watermarked. If anyone interested, I can download the torrent, convert all images to PNG and re-host them. [edited January 31, 2006 by Dioxaz] IP: 83.159.39.201 |
Keith Hemari unregistered
|
posted January 31, 2006 07:35 AM
eh?The referance images are in BMP format. Just about any graphics viewer in existence should be able to handle that format. Whatever default paint program your computer came with should be enough. I just converted them over to GIF for the sake of saving space and bandwidth. Now, the manuals are in TIF format and that might take a special program. IP: 65.185.143.72 |
Dioxaz unregistered
|
posted January 31, 2006 02:56 PM
Yes, the originals are DG2 files, not BMPs in the game (but the TIFFs were already like that). They were converted by the person who made the torrent (this was a good idea since DG2 is an obscure format).However, I converted all images of the torrent in PNG, thus saving a lot space (more than GIF could do, as they were already palette-based) and I now can offer them to download: http://dioxaz.free.fr/download/art/sjam_images.zip It's 46.4 MB "only" (note that I still have 400 MB free on my web account, so if anyone interested in hosting any X-treme related info, I'm here). [edited January 31, 2006 by Dioxaz] IP: 83.159.39.201 |
Keith Hemari unregistered
|
posted January 31, 2006 03:18 PM
Oh oh oh, I thought you were referring to the torrents files. Ok.I was going to use PNG, but I'm still not clear on the compatibility issues with PNG. I know Firefox can fully support PNG images, but I'm not sure about IE and Netscape and figured it was best to just go ahead and use the GIF format. Photoshop is pretty good about getting a decent compression for black and white GIFs without loosing much detail, so I just went with that. [edited January 31, 2006 by Keith Hemari] IP: 65.185.143.72 |
thebeast unregistered
|
posted January 31, 2006 04:37 PM
a quick post:thank you Dioxas! As one of the people who has great difficulty with torrents I find things like this very considerate and very cool, cheers mate! The characer artwork and Sonic the Screensave box art was worth the download time alone. MeX PS i could go into what a superior collection Sonic Jam as a whole was, but I figure i'll leave that. IP: 172.216.119.8 |
Dioxaz unregistered
|
posted February 01, 2006 01:36 PM
quote: I was going to use PNG, but I'm still not clear on the compatibility issues with PNG. I know Firefox can fully support PNG images, but I'm not sure about IE and Netscape and figured it was best to just go ahead and use the GIF format.
We can virtually consider every browser on earth supports PNG by now. PNG support was implemented both in Internet Explorer 4.0 and Netscape 4.04 back in 1997 and had been improved in Netscape by adding alpha tranparency with version 6.0 (IE only supports simple transparency in palette-based images in versions prior to 7). All other browsers support PNG perfectly (at least with alpha transparency). Since almost nobody use so old browsers, I think PNG should be considered as a safe choice.thebeast - You're welcome. Since, I don't have download speed restrictions by now on this 'free.fr' account, I thougt it was a good idea to host that Sonic Jam art package. [edited February 01, 2006 by Dioxaz] IP: 83.159.39.201 |
SANiK Moderator
|
posted February 21, 2006 07:58 PM
Nothing new - I thought I'd put this up for archival purposes: http://jamesseph.phpwebhosting.com/users/kurisu/Box%20Covers/son1996.png It's just a "hi-quality" scan of one of the Sonic designs that the marketing team wanted to use I found it digging through a 1996 backup of the sega website [edited February 21, 2006 by SANiK] [edited February 21, 2006 by SANiK] IP: 71.250.79.134 |
Xeniczone Member
|
posted February 22, 2006 04:59 AM
that is a rip from sonic 3d blast not sonic xtreme the sonic xtreme one is much darker and he eyes aren't messed up looking. i found a rip but it is a megazine scan and will need quality enhanceing. IP: 69.243.130.47 |
McAleeCh unregistered
|
posted February 22, 2006 05:10 AM
quote: Originally posted by Xeniczone: that is a rip from sonic 3d blast not sonic xtreme the sonic xtreme one is much darker and he eyes aren't messed up looking.
While I've heard that the image *was* used to promote 3D Blast / Flickies' Island in some parts of the world, this magazine scan from Sonic CulT shows the image on a concept X-treme box - one that seems much later than the previously-shown designs, as it uses a later version of the ESRB's "RP" stamp in the bottom-right corner than the other boxarts do, as well as having a proper background. Compare it to the image SANiK posted and to the other X-treme boxart; you'll find it matches SANiK's perfectly (except in colouring, though that's likely due to it being a dodgy scan / print, as everything else is exactly the same). [edited February 22, 2006 by McAleeCh] IP: 193.61.84.99 |
Xeniczone Member
|
posted February 22, 2006 10:22 AM
I don't think that is the origanal. I think the one that karisu posted at the beginning of the forums is the origanal. Becuase this one has 2 issues the Sonic Xtreme over laps Sega Saturn Where it sould be Sonic Xtreme overlaps the white and then Sega Saturn overleaps everything.What this may be is a earlier test or a europein cover because europe always has different covers then america. But that wouldn't be right becuase europe didn't use the tall cases. IP: 69.243.130.47 |
Dioxaz unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2006 01:51 AM
quote: Originally posted by Xeniczone: What this may be is a earlier test or a europein cover because europe always has different covers then america. But that wouldn't be right becuase europe didn't use the tall cases.
Well, on European box arts, "Sega Saturn" is always written on a black background, so I doubt this can be a European cover... probably a test but not the cover itself (the writing on the white bg might be a mistake or non-intentional).By the way, I've got a transparent version of the image SANiK posted: http://www.sonicresearch.org/art/albums/Sonic/Other/sonic3dblast_sonic01.png As transparency was added afterwards by me, many artifacts remain. Note that I also mistook this as a Sonic 3D Blast artwork when I put it on the Sonic Art Archive. McAleeCh - this image is not the one we see on the first cover shown by kurisu, it's a bit different. It's more likely this one: http://www.sonicresearch.org/art/albums/Sonic/Other/sonicxtrem1.png This was given to me for the Sonic Art Archive and ripped by Rlan from a low-resolution scan, which explains the somewhat blurry look. Curiously, "my" version doesn't have that motion effect. EDIT: my apologizes, too, for misinterpreting your previous post. I thought you were talking about the fisrt cover art shown in this topic and trying to compare it with "SANiK's artwork". [edited February 23, 2006 by Dioxaz] IP: 83.159.39.201 |
McAleeCh unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2006 04:13 AM
quote: Originally posted by Dioxaz: McAleeCh - this image is not the one we see on the first cover shown by kurisu, it's a bit different. It's more likely this one: http://www.sonicresearch.org/art/albums/Sonic/Other/sonicxtrem1.png This was given to me for the Sonic Art Archive and ripped by Rlan from a low-resolution scan, which explains the somewhat blurry look. Curiously, "my" version doesn't have that motion effect.[/B]
Ehe, my above post was worded slightly incorrectly.. ^_^; I apologise, and can see how it could be misinterpreted. I wasn't meaning to infer that I thought that the image you and SANiK posted was used on *all* the boxarts, just that it was the same as the one on the boxart I posted, since Xeniczone had said that it was a 3D Blast promotional image and not X-treme. The reason I said to "compare to the other boxarts posted" was just so that people would compare and see that it isn't the same image as on those ones, but was a direct match with the one SANiK had posted, meaning it *was* used for X-treme promotion at some time. ^^; Guess I should have waited until a time when I was more awake to type out that original post, since the wording is kinda confusing. Again, apologies for that! Xeniczone - As for the possibility of the boxart I posted being an earlier/European boxart, it's unlikely IMO, for the following reasons: - For starters, the US ESRB rating in the bottom right corner discounts it being a European boxart; and, as Dioxaz said, it uses a white backing for the SEGA Saturn logo. - Secondly, as I already stated, it uses a much later version of the ESRB rating logo than the other two boxarts, meaning it must have been at least mocked up at a later time than the two revisions of the other boxart that we have. Odd, though: the X-treme logo and Sonic were both re-done for this boxart; however, Sonic was posed in the same position, and the X-treme logo is very similar to the version of the other boxart with the "3D effect" on the letters. Obviously they weren't happy with the originals, but to re-create them so similarly doesn't make sense if that were the case.. [edited February 23, 2006 by McAleeCh] IP: 193.61.84.99 |
Xeniczone Member
|
posted February 23, 2006 04:56 AM
I will look up the other games in the ad. Becuase it is odd that all the other games already have ratings on them and sonic xtreme doesn't and all the other games excist and sonic xtreme doesn't. it accually could be a fake.IP: 69.243.130.47 |
McAleeCh unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2006 05:26 AM
Xeniczone - I'm fairly sure most of those other games are the final boxarts; DKC3 and MK3 I'm pretty much certain of, though I never played Soviet Strike so I can't be sure of that one. Good luck looking them up, though!The X-treme box in that article, according to Sonic CulT, was one of the most frequently used ones in magazines and toy store catalogues, so I doubt it was just a mockup made by the magazine themselves. You never know, though.. Until further information arises, I'll assume it's genuine SEGA PR material - if nothing else because I've just annotated all of the boxarts to try and provide some chronological order as to how the marketing people developed the look: These are arranged in what I believe to be the chronological order of the boxart designs; you can sort of see my reasoning in the above annotations: 1. Earliest Boxart. Reasoning: - Only boxart NOT to feature "SEGA" seal - Logo uses incorrect font in this revision - Stiffly-posed Sonic render with proportion issues (fingers, anyone?) - Rarely used in magazines / toy store catalogues / online (source: Sonic CulT) 2. Second Boxart. Reasoning: Boxart is same as (1) apart from: - Addition of the "SEGA" seal. - Logo redesign including attempted 'fixing' the "O" of the font, showing the initial font mistake was realised - therefore unlikely to be earlier that (1). - Commonly seen, mostly online (source: Sonic CulT) 3. Third Boxart. Reasoning: - Logo seems to be developed from (2)'s (uses same / similar "X-treme" text, and uses 3D effect idea), so unlikely to be earlier than (1) or (2). - SONIC font is completely fixed in logo. - SEGA seal is present, so unlikely to be earlier than (1). - Uses later design of the ESRB rating stamp than (1) or (2), suggesting both previous boxarts were made earlier than this one. - Different Sonic model with fixed proportions and more intricate posing (head and eyes are now posed, feet / torso / fingers proportions fixed), so unlikely to be between (1) and (2) - why would they revert back to the old design? - Full background render as opposed the hazy "clouds filter" backdrop of previous boxarts - unlikely to be between (1) and (2) for the same reasons as the point above. - Extremely (or should that be "X-tremely"?) common in magazines and toy-store catalogues (source: Sonic CulT) --- Of course, that's all speculation based on my own observations, so I may be wrong. If anyone can find any holes in my reasoning, feel free to tell me! ^_^; It seems logical enough to me, though.. [edited February 23, 2006 by McAleeCh] IP: 193.61.84.99 |
Xeniczone Member
|
posted February 23, 2006 01:26 PM
I agree with you I KNOW, not think KNOW, all those boxarts are correct EXCEPT sonic xtreme because it is never release. But there are 2 things about it I like to ask.Sega would never cover up the Sega Saturn Logo that much and if they did they would have over laps the Sega Saturn logo with the Sonic Xtreme so that it was on top if it not the Sonic X-treme logo on top of Sega. What is the difference in the ESRP stamps? And I think the first one you mentioned was in a very early copy of a magazen this was really early and may have been a very early copy of Sonic X-treme cover. IP: 69.243.130.47 | |